|
|
||||||||
Vol. 49, Issue 1, 1-52, March 1997
Scuola Superiore St. Anna and Istituto di Chimica Biologica, University of Pisa, Italy
I. Introduction
A. The ryanodine receptor
B. Study of Ryanodine Receptor Modulation
1. Ca2+ release studies.
2. Single-channel studies.
3. [3H]ryanodine binding.
4. Indirect studies.
II. Modulation of the Ryanodine Receptor
A. Endogenous Modulators
1. Ions.
2. Nucleotides.
3. Cyclic adenosine diphosphate-ribose.
4. Lipid derivatives.
5. Endogenous polyamines.
6. Phosphorylation.
7. Ryanodine receptor-protein interactions.
8. Other endogenous modulators.
B. Pharmacological Modulators
1. Ryanoids.
2. Purine derivatives and related compounds.
3. Anthraquinones.
4. Digitalis glycosides.
5. Milrinone and other bipyridine derivatives.
6. Suramin.
7. Halogenated hydrocarbons and phenols.
8. Macrocyclic compounds.
9. Heparin.
10. Polyamines.
11. FLA365.
12. Dantrolene.
13. Local anesthetics.
14. Phenylalkylamines.
15. Peptides.
16. Agents producing covalent modifications.
17. Others.
C. Overview of the Mechanisms of Ryanodine Receptor Modulation
III. The Ryanodine Receptor in Disease
A. Myocardial Ischemia and Reperfusion
B. Cardiac Hypertrophy and Failure
C. Malignant Hyperthermia
D. Other Skeletal Muscle Diseases
E. Smooth Muscle and Nonmuscle Diseases
IV. Conclusions
References
| |
I. Introduction |
|---|
|
|
|---|
A. The ryanodine receptor
The ryanodine receptor (RyR)c corresponds
to the sarcoplasmic reticulum (SR) Ca2+ channel (Inui et
al., 1987
; Imagawa et al., 1987
). Its structure and function have been
reviewed recently (Fleischer and Inui, 1989
; Lai and Meissner, 1989
;
McPherson and Campbell, 1993a
; Sorrentino and Volpe, 1993
; Coronado et
al., 1994
; Meissner, 1994
; Ogawa, 1994
; Sorrentino, 1995
; Wagenknecht
and Radermacher, 1995
; Marks, 1996
; Sutko and Airey, 1996
), and only a
few issues will be recalled here.
The RyR binds specifically the plant alkaloid ryanodine, which is the
reason for its name. In striated muscle, RyRs are located at the
triadic junctions between SR terminal cisternae and sarcolemmal T-tubules (Fleischer et al., 1985
) and correspond to the "feet" structures observed in electron microscope images within the triads. However, RyRs also have been identified in SR structures that do not
lie in contiguity with the sarcolemma, such as corbular and expanded
junctional SR, and in intracellular membranes of other cells and
tissues, such as brain, smooth muscle, endothelium, liver, and
fibroblasts (Franzini-Armstrong and Jorgensen, 1994
; Meissner, 1994
).
The RyR has been purified, cloned, and sequenced from a variety of
species, and several isoforms have been identified. Mammalian tissues
express three isoforms, known as RyR1, RyR2, and RyR3. They include
about 5000 (4872 to 5037) amino acid residues and are encoded by three
different genes. In humans, the three genes are located on chromosomes
19, 1, and 15, respectively. RyR1 and RyR2 are expressed predominatly
in skeletal muscle and in cardiac muscle, respectively (Marks et al.,
1989
; Takeshima et al., 1989
; Nakai et al., 1990
; Otsu et al., 1990
;
Zorzato et al., 1990
). RyR3 has a wide tissue distribution (Ledbetter
et al., 1994
; Giannini et al., 1995
), although it has been originally
identified in brain (Hakamata et al., 1992
) and is sometimes called
"brain isoform." All three isoforms are actually expressed in
brain, and the major brain isoform does not appear to be RyR3, but
rather RyR2 (Witcher et al., 1992
; McPherson and Campbell, 1993b
;
Murayama and Ogawa, 1996b
). Alternative splicing variants of RyR1 and
RyR2 have been identified, but their functional relevance remains to be
established (Sutko and Airey, 1996
). Two RyR isoforms, known as
-RyR
and
-RyR, have been identified in fish, amphibian, and avian
skeletal muscle (Airey et al., 1990
, 1993b
; Olivares et al., 1991
;
Sutko et al., 1991
; Lai et al., 1992
; Murayama and Ogawa, 1992
), and they are the homologues of mammalian RyR1 and RyR3, respectively (Oyamada et al., 1994
; Ottini et al., 1996
). The overall identity of
the RyR isoforms is of the order of 66 to 67%.
The RyR monomer has a sedimentation coefficient of about 30S and a
molecular weight of about 560 kDa. The functional receptor is thought
to be a homotetramer, which has a quarterfoil shape and a size of 22 to
27 nm on each side (Inui et al., 1987
; Lai et al., 1988
; Wagenknecht et
al., 1989
). The center of the quarterfoil includes a pore, with a
diameter of 1 to 2 nm, that most likely represents the Ca2+
channel. There is structural and functional evidence that the central
channel is connected to four radial channels included in the peripheral
portion of each monomer (Wagenknecht et al., 1989
; Ding and Kasai,
1996
). Near its cytoplasmic end, the channel appears to be blocked by a
mass, sometimes referred to as the "plug," that might be involved
in the modulation of channel conductance. The pore region corresponds
to the carboxy-terminal portion of each RyR monomer and includes,
according to different suggested models, four (Takeshima et al., 1989
;
Nakai et al., 1990
; Hakamata et al., 1992
) or 10 to 12 (Zorzato et al.,
1990
; Otsu et al., 1990
) transmembrane segments. Results obtained with
site-specific antibodies (Grunwald and Meissner, 1995
) support the
four-transmembrane segment model, whereas cryoelectron microscopy data
(Serysheva et al., 1995
; Wagenknecht and Radermacher, 1995
) favor the
10-transmembrane segment model. The rest of the molecule forms a large
extramembrane region that corresponds to the foot structure, has a
hollow appearance, and includes at least two domains in each monomer
(Serysheva et al., 1995
). Recent observations suggest that the channel
opening is associated with a 4° rotation of the transmembrane with
respect to the cytosolic region (Orlova et al., 1996
).
The channel included in the RyR is a cation-selective channel with low
cationic selectivity and large unitary conductance. With
Ca2+ as current carrier, the maximum conductance was equal
to 80 pS for the cardiac channel, and to 172 pS for the skeletal muscle channel, with a dissociation constant
3 to 4 mM
(Smith et al., 1988
; Lindsay and Williams, 1991
). The maximum
conductance was higher with monocations as current carriers, e.g.,
about 0.6/1 nS with Na+ and K+, respectively
(Smith et al., 1988
; Liu et al., 1989
). Although in single salt
solutions, channel conductance was higher for monocations than for
Ca2+, in mixed salts, channel permeability was higher for
Ca2+ than for monovalent cations. This finding has been
interpreted on the basis of a model in which multiple ion-binding sites
are arranged sequentially, assuming that Ca2+ binding is
favored over monocation binding. In particular, a four-barrier,
three-binding-site model might account for the experimental results
(Tinker et al., 1992b
; Tinker and Williams, 1992
, 1993c
).
The RyR mediates the efflux of Ca2+ from the SR or other intracellular stores. In striated muscle, it has a central role in excitation-contraction coupling, i.e., in the coupling between sarcolemmal depolarization and SR Ca2+ release.
There are at least two mechanisms that have been proposed to mediate
excitation-contraction coupling. According to the direct-coupling model, SR Ca2+ release is produced by a direct interaction
between the dihydropyridine and the RyRs. In particular, sarcolemmal
depolarization is thought to produce a conformational change in the
dihydropyridine receptor that is transmitted to the RyR and induces the
release of Ca2+ from the SR (Rios and Pizarro, 1991
; Rios
et al., 1993
; Schneider et al., 1994
). In this model, the
dihydropyridine receptor acts primarily as a voltage sensor rather than
as a channel, because sarcolemmal calcium influx is not required for
excitation-contraction coupling. Close contiguity between the ryanodine
and dihydropyridine receptors has been shown by morphological studies
(Block et al., 1988
) and confirmed by biochemical investigations (Marty
et al., 1994
), although it is still uncertain whether other proteins
that are closely associated with the dihydropyridine and RyRs (see below, II.A.7.) may play a role in the coupling process.
Alternatively, excitation-contraction coupling might be mediated by a
process known as Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release
(Fabiato, 1983
). Because the SR channel is activated by an increase in
cytosolic [Ca2+] (see below, II.A.1.a.), the sarcolemmal
Ca2+ current, although insufficient to activate the
contractile process directly, could induce further release of
Ca2+ from the SR. This process may be favored by the
existence of Ca2+ gradients in the cytosol, because
Ca2+ ions entering the cell through the dihydropyridine
receptor seem to have preferential access to the RyR, establishing a
sort of "functional coupling" (Cannell et al., 1995
; Sham et al.,
1995
).
The relative importance of these two mechanisms is still controversial.
There is evidence that in skeletal muscle, the former (i.e., direct
coupling) is sufficient to induce tension development, whereas in
cardiac muscle, Ca2+ influx is necessary for contraction,
and Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release is thought to be
the dominant mechanism (Näbauer et al., 1989
; Callewaert, 1992
;
Stern, 1992
; Meissner, 1994
). Consistently, morphological data suggest
closer association of dihydropyridine and RyRs in skeletal muscle than
in cardiac muscle (Sun et al., 1995
). However, a large fraction of
skeletal muscle RyRs are not associated with dihydropyridine receptors
(Franzini-Armstrong and Jorgensen, 1994
), and it has been suggested
that Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release might also
contribute to skeletal muscle activation (Anderson and Meissner, 1995
;
Yano et al., 1995b
; Klein et al., 1996
).
It is still uncertain whether the different modes of
excitation-contraction coupling are related to differences in the RyR, in the dihydropyridine receptor, or in other components. Experiments performed in dysgenic myotubes with chimeric dihydropyridine receptors suggested that specific regions of the skeletal muscle dihydropyridine receptor (included between transmembrane repeats II and III) determine the appearance of skeletal-type excitation-contraction coupling (Tanabe
et al., 1990
). This conclusion has not been supported by the results of
another study (Lu et al., 1994
), in which peptides including the
putative cytoplasmic loops between transmembrane repeats II and III of
skeletal and cardiac dihydropyridine receptors were expressed in
Escherichia coli, because both types of peptides activated
the skeletal but not the cardiac RyR, suggesting that the type of
excitation-contraction coupling was determined by the RyR.
B. Study of Ryanodine Receptor Modulation
In recent years, the RyR has emerged as the target of pharmacological interventions, and RyR alterations have been implicated in the pathogenesis of several diseases. These issues will be the object of the present review.
A brief description of the techniques used in the study of RyR modulation may be useful. Special emphasis will be given to the assay of Ca2+ release, to single channel studies, and to [3H]ryanodine binding experiments. Results obtained with indirect techniques will also be mentioned whenever they add valuable information.
1. Ca2+ release studies.
In Ca2+
release experiments, SR vesicles are loaded with labeled or unlabeled
Ca2+ by passive diffusion or by active uptake.
Ca2+ release is then induced by exposing the SR to a
release solution, and its kinetics are determined. If free
Ca2+ concentration is assayed by metallochromic indicators,
the increase in extravesicular Ca2+ concentration can be
monitored after rapid mixing of the preparation with release buffer
(stopped flow technique) (Yamamoto and Kasai, 1982
; Kim et al., 1983
;
Nagasaki and Kasai, 1983
; Ikemoto et al., 1989
). If 45Ca is
used, residual vesicle radioactivity must be measured at different time
points. This can be accomplished with rapid quenching (Meissner, 1984
,
1988
; Ikemoto et al., 1985
; Meissner et al., 1986
; Meissner and
Henderson, 1987
) or rapid filtration techniques (Dupont, 1984
; Submilla
and Inesi, 1987
; Chiesi et al., 1988
; Moutin and Dupont, 1988
;
Calviello and Chiesi, 1989
).
1,
corresponding to a half-life of 10 to 35 msec. An accurate evaluation of SR Ca2+ release requires, therefore, a temporal
resolution in the millisecond range, which is usually achieved through
automatized or semi-automatized devices.
2. Single-channel studies.
SR vesicles or purified RyRs are
incorporated into artificial lipid bilayers, which separate two ionic
solutions. Incorporation of a channel in the bilayer is shown by the
appearance of a current flowing between the two chambers (Coronado et
al., 1992
). The chamber to which channels are added is called
cis chamber; the other one is called trans
chamber. Channel incorporation is usually polar, so that the cytosolic
face corresponds to the cis chamber. Current recordings show
spontaneous openings and closures and are used to calculate the
conductance of the channel and its open probability, that is, the
fractional time during which the channel is open, henceforward designed
as Po. Channel gating is described on the basis of mathematical models
that assume the existence of one or more open state(s) and one or more
closed state(s). Statistical techniques provide a detailed evaluation
of channel gating. The usual approach (lifetime analysis) consists in
determining the time constant of each state, which is linearly related
to its mean lifetime (Ashley and Williams, 1990
; Jackson, 1992
). Increased current may be due to increased conductance of the open channel or to increased Po. The latter can be due either to increased lifetime of the open channel or to decreased lifetime of the closed channel, also referred to as increased frequency of channel opening.
3. [3H]ryanodine binding.
The production of
radiolabeled ryanodine (Pessah et al., 1985
; Sutko et al., 1986
)
introduced a new approach in the study of RyR structure and function.
High affinity binding of [3H]ryanodine to the RyR has
been extensively characterized. In a variety of tissues, the
dissociation constant (KD) for
[3H]ryanodine was in the low nanomolar range. The Hill
coefficient was
1, and the kinetic KD,
i.e., the ratio of the dissociation and association constants, was
close to the equilibrium KD (Pessah et al.,
1985
, 1986
; Michalak et al., 1988
; Lai et al., 1989
; McGrew et al.,
1989
; Holmberg and Williams, 1990a
; Carroll et al., 1991
; Pessah and
Zimanyi, 1991
). High affinity [3H]ryanodine binding was
correlated to the functional state of the Ca2+ channel.
Conditions that are associated with increased channel Po usually
favored [3H]ryanodine binding, suggesting that ryanodine
binds to the open channel. However, exceptions to this rule have been
described, and this issue will be further discussed in section II.C.
4. Indirect studies.
RyR function often has been evaluated
indirectly. For instance, tension development by skinned cells or
intact preparations after exposure to caffeine or after rapid cooling
has been regarded as an index of SR Ca2+ release. Although
such techniques may produce useful results, their limitations should be
kept in mind. The contractile response can be affected by actions at
the contractile protein level, and both caffeine and rapid cooling have
multiple targets besides the RyR (Akera, 1990
; Feher and Rebeyka,
1994
). Similar considerations apply to the analysis of changes in
intracellular Ca2+ concentration (Ca2+
transients), which are affected by other sarcolemmal or intracellular Ca2+ transport systems, and by Ca2+ binding to
intracellular proteins.
| |
II. Modulation of the Ryanodine Receptor |
|---|
|
|
|---|
Many substances can modulate RyR function. In this section (section II.), endogenous (physiological) and exogenous (pharmacological) modulators are distinguished, and their mechanisms of action are discussed. For the sake of clarity, the former subsection also includes ions that are not physiological cell components, but whose action is related closely to that of endogenous ions. A comprehensive summary of the effects of the chief endogenous and pharmacological modulators on Ca2+ release, single-channel gating, and [3H]ryanodine binding is provided in tables 1 and 2, respectively.
|
|
A. Endogenous Modulators
1. Ions.
; Kirino et al., 1983
;
Nagasaki and Kasai, 1983
; Chamberlain et al., 1984a
; Meissner, 1984
;
Meissner et al., 1986
; Rousseau et al., 1986
; Meissner and Henderson,
1987
; Submilla and Inesi, 1987
; Moutin and Dupont, 1988
; Calviello and Chiesi, 1989
; Donoso and Hidalgo, 1993
). In order to explain the biphasic response to Ca2+, it has been suggested that the
RyR contains a high-affinity Ca2+ binding site, which
stimulates Ca2+ release, and a low-affinity
Ca2+ binding site, which inhibits Ca2+ release.
At physiological concentrations of Mg2+ and adenine
nucleotides, the activating action of Ca2+ was cooperative,
with Hill coefficient close to 2 and EC50
2 µM. In the absence of Mg2+ and nucleotides,
the EC50 was lower (0.5 µM), and the Hill
coefficient was close to 1 (Meissner et al., 1986
). The
IC50 for Ca2+ inhibition of Ca2+
release has been estimated to be of the order of 120 to 150 µM, with a Hill coefficient > 1 (Nagasaki and
Kasai, 1983
; Meissner et al., 1986
). Recent results have shown that the
sensitivity to Ca2+-induced Ca2+ release was
about 10 times lower for RyR3 than for the other isoforms (Takeshima et
al., 1995
).
300 to 500 µM and Hill coefficient = 1.3 (Ma et al., 1988
26 µM). In frog skeletal
muscle, two populations of channels have been distinguished on the
basis of inhibition or lack of inhibition by millimolar
Ca2+ (Murayama and Ogawa, 1992
-RyR was more sensitive to inhibition by
millimolar Ca2+ than was
-RyR (Percival et al., 1994
250 µM) trans Ca2+ increased channel
Po, and the effect decreased at higher concentrations. At positive
holding potentials, 5 to 10 mM trans
Ca2+ was needed to activate the channel. On the basis of
the response to other cations and to Ca2+ buffers, the
authors concluded that luminal Ca2+ modulate the Po by
diffusing through the channel and interacting with Ca2+-
activation and Ca2+-inactivation sites located on the
cytosolic side. Binding experiments have shown that high affinity
[3H]ryanodine binding is strictly
Ca2+-dependent. In skeletal muscle (Pessah et al., 1985
-RyR, which is thought
to be homologue to mammalian RyR3 (Murayama and Ogawa, 1996b
and
isoforms of the RyR was that the latter did not show any decrease
of [3H]ryanodine binding at high Ca2+
concentration (O'Brien et al., 1995
1.5 (Meissner and Henderson, 1987
can modulate SR Ca2+ release. According to
Sukhareva et al. (1994)
was included both in the luminal and in
the release solution, although either luminal Cl
alone or
extravesicular Cl
alone were stimulatory. On the other
hand, Allard and Rougier (1994)
in the
intravesicular buffer, reported inhibition of Ca2+ release
by extravesicular Cl
. In single-channel experiments,
Cl
did not affect Ca2+ fluxes, and its
effects on Ca2+ release were attributed to activation of a
nonselective Cl
channel localized in junctional SR. This
channel was blocked by ruthenium red and clofibric acid (Sukhareva et
al., 1994
-RyR showed a higher
Ca2+ sensitivity than
-RyR at high (1 M
NaCl) but not at low (0.17 M NaCl) ionic strength (Murayama
and Ogawa, 1996a2. Nucleotides.
Adenine nucleotides activate the RyR.
Ca2+ release studies performed in skeletal muscle
(Morii and Tonomura, 1983
; Nagasaki and Kasai, 1983
; Meissner, 1984
;
Meissner et al., 1986
; Sumbilla and Inesi, 1987
; Moutin and Dupont,
1988
; Calviello and Chiesi, 1989
; Wyskovsky et al., 1990
; Donoso and
Hidalgo, 1993
) have shown that in the presence of adenine nucleotides,
Ca2+ release occurred, even at nanomolar Ca2+
concentration and/or in the presence of Mg2+. The
Ca2+-activation curve was shifted to the left, and the
maximum rate of Ca2+ release was increased. In fact, full
activation of Ca2+ release required the presence of both
Ca2+ and nucleotides. The EC50 for adenine
nucleotides was in the millimolar range at all Ca2+
concentrations, and the Hill coefficient was close to 2 (Meissner et
al., 1986
). In cardiac muscle, the effect of adenine nucleotides was
qualitatively similar, although less remarkable (Rousseau et al., 1986
;
Meissner and Henderson, 1987
). The order of potency was adenosine
5'-(
,
-methylene)triphosphate (AMP-PCP) > cyclic AMP (cAMP) > adenosine diphosphate (ADP) > adenosine monophosphate (AMP), while
nonadenine nucleotides, such as cytosine triphosphate (CTP), guanosine
triphosphate (GTP), inosine triphosphate (ITP), and uridine
triphosphate (UTP) were ineffective (Morii and Tonomura, 1983
;
Meissner, 1984
). In cardiac muscle, adenosine and adenine were also
effective (Meissner, 1984
), whereas in skeletal muscle, Ca2+ release was produced by adenine but not by adenosine
(Rousseau et al., 1988
).
3. Cyclic adenosine diphosphate-ribose.
Cyclic ADP-ribose
(cADPR) is an endogenous metabolite of nicotinamide-adenine
dinucleotide (NAD), which is thought to act as a second-messenger in
several tissues (Clapper et al., 1987
; Lee et al., 1989
). In sea urchin
eggs, nanomolar cADPR induced Ca2+ release from
intracellular stores. Its action was independent from inositol
1,4,5-trisphosphate, was inhibited by ruthenium red and endogenous
polyamines, and was potentiated by Ca2+, ryanodine, and
caffeine (Galione et al., 1991
, 1993a
,b
; Galione and White, 1994
; Lee
et al., 1993
; Chini et al., 1995
). On the basis of these observations,
it has been suggested that cADPR activates the RyR. However, other
findings have questioned this conclusion. In sea urchin eggs,
Ca2+ release showed peculiar properties, because it was
dependent on the presence of calmodulin (Lee et al., 1994
, 1995
; Tanaka and Tashjian, 1995
), and it was not activated by ATP (Graeff et al.,
1995
). In addition, the cADPR derivative 8-amino-cADPR antagonized cADPR-induced, but not ryanodine-induced, Ca2+ release
(Walseth and Lee, 1993
). Finally, photoaffinity labeling studies showed
that cADPR binds to two proteins of 100 kDa and 140 kDa (Walseth et
al., 1993
), and it is not known whether such proteins interact with the
RyR or rather represent a novel type of Ca2+ channel. It
should be stressed that RyR expression has not been extensively studied
in sea urchin eggs. Antibodies raised against RyR1 identified a 380-kDa
protein that has not been further characterized (McPherson et al.,
1992
). More recently, Ca2+-sensitive and caffeine-sensitive
[3H]ryanodine binding has been described in a preliminary
report, but no modulation by cADPR and ATP has been detected (Lokuta et al., 1996
).
cells, pancreatic and lacrimal acinar cells, vascular smooth muscle, heart and skeletal muscle preparations, lymphoma cells, and
plant vacuoles (Koshiyama et al., 1991
1 µM cADPR, but this action occurred only at high
(micromolar) Ca2+ concentration, was shared by ADPR and
-NAD+, and was not detected in the presence of
physiological concentrations of ATP and Mg2+. These authors
concluded that cADPR interacts with the adenine nucleotide binding
site. They also stressed that the physiological tissue concentration of
cADPR, that is, 20 to 600 nM, according to Walseth et al.
(1991)4. Lipid derivatives.
In skeletal muscle, but not in cardiac
muscle, palmitoyl carnitine and other long-chain (>C14) acyl
carnitines induced SR Ca2+ release (El-Hayek et al., 1993
;
Dumonteil et al., 1994
). The stimulation of Ca2+ release
was slower than that produced by Ca2+ or ATP and had a lag
of about 100 to 150 msec. Consistently, palmitoyl carnitine increased
ryanodine binding at all Ca2+ concentrations (1 µM to 1 mM). In mammalian muscle, palmitoyl carnitine increased the Bmax without affecting the
KD (El-Hayek et al., 1993
), whereas in avian
muscle, Dumonteil et al. (1994)
reported increased affinity with
unchanged Bmax. In bilayer experiments, channel Po
increased, due to an increased ratio of long-lived versus short-lived
openings. These actions occurred at concentrations ranging from 5 to
100 µM (EC50 = 10 to 15 µM),
and their physiological or pathophysiological implications are
uncertain, because the plasma palmitoyl carnitine concentration is of
the order of 2 to 4 µM, but the cytosolic concentration
might be higher (Dumonteil et al., 1994
).
12 µM), but single-channel Po was
unaffected.
Sphingosine, a long-chain amino-alcohol that is a component of
sphingolipids, inhibited Ca2+-induced, caffeine-induced,
and doxorubicin-induced Ca2+ release from skeletal and
cardiac SR (Sabbadini et al., 19925. Endogenous polyamines.
Palade (1987c)
first reported that
caffeine-induced and thymol-induced Ca2+ release were
inhibited by endogenous polyamines such as spermine, spermidine, and
putrescine. The IC50 for spermine was in the 10 to 100 µM range, whereas spermidine and putrescine, which
contain fewer amino groups, were less effective.
6. Phosphorylation.
The RyR is the substrate of several
protein kinases, namely cAMP-dependent protein kinase (PKA),
cGMP-dependent protein kinase (PKG), protein kinase C (PKC), and
calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMK). There is evidence that
junctional SR contains membrane-bound CaMK (Chu et al., 1990b
).